PG&E has spent $46.1 million in a bold attempt to purchase constitutional protection for their monopoly. The No On 16 campaign, largely run by volunteers on a shoestring budget of $80,000, has amassed endorsements from over 60 newspapers, 100 municipalities, and scores of civic and environmental groups. The race is predicted to be close - here's how to reach No On 16 on election night,

The CPUC will decide whether to follow TURN's recommendations to prevent utility shut-offs this Thursday, February 4th

TURN's response to PG&E's unfair power grab

Mark Toney writes in the San Francisco Chronicle that conservation and energy efficiency will save more energy than expensive, unproven smart meters.

TURN attorney Marcel Hawiger explains how Californians can get "More Green for Less Green" and encourage renewable energy that doesn't force taxpayers and rate payers to spend more.

Clotheslines vs. climate change institute- read TURN's editorial in the San Francisco Chronicle.

TURN Fact Sheet: PG&E has announced it will seek close to $4 billion more from its customers in its upcoming general rate case (GRC). TURN opposes higher PG&E rates.

TURN explains why "smart meters" are a dumb idea. In short, they're expensive, don't help you save energy and put your privacy at risk.

PG&E seems to hit customers with rate hikes as regularly as fog hits San Francisco. And PG&E’s current rate case, which TURN is fighting at the CPUC, asks for a historically high $4 billion increase, which would surely hit consumers hard.